Merging Repositories with Conflicting Histories
Understanding Merge Conflicts
When you try to merge two repositories with conflicting commit histories, Git may encounter situations where the same files or lines of code have been modified in different ways. This is known as a merge conflict, and it requires manual intervention to resolve.
Identifying Merge Conflicts
You can identify merge conflicts by running the git status
command after attempting to merge the repositories. Git will list the files with conflicting changes, and you'll need to address these conflicts before the merge can be completed.
git status
## On branch master
## You have unmerged paths.
## (fix conflicts and run "git commit")
## ## Unmerged paths:
## (use "git add <file>..." to mark resolution)
## ## both modified: README.md
Resolving Merge Conflicts
To resolve merge conflicts, you'll need to manually edit the conflicting files and choose which changes to keep. Git will mark the conflicting sections with special markers, such as <<<<<<< HEAD
, =======
, and >>>>>>> branch-name
. You'll need to remove these markers and keep the desired changes.
<<<<<<< HEAD
This is the content in the local repository.
=======
This is the content in the remote repository.
>>>>>>> remote-branch
After resolving the conflicts, you can stage the changes using git add
and then commit the merged changes with git commit
.
Avoiding Merge Conflicts
To avoid merge conflicts, it's recommended to keep your local and remote repositories in sync by regularly pulling the latest changes from the remote repository and pushing your local changes. This can be done using the following commands:
git pull
git push
By keeping your repositories synchronized, you can minimize the chances of encountering merge conflicts when merging changes from different sources.